Saturday, August 31, 2013


APOSTASY AND ANTICHRIST ACCORDING TO THE HOLY FATHERS OF THE CHURCH
Part I

(Exerted from a booklet published by Holy Trinity Monastery, Jordanville, NY in 1992, no longer in print.)

Preface

“First, be aware of this: In the last days scoffers will enter…saying, ‘where is the promise of His coming?  For…all things continue to be as they were since the dawn of creation’”.

True to this prophecy of the Holy Apostle Peter, there are many such scoffers amongst us.  There are even many who bear the name Christian who have, nevertheless, ceased to hope on the return of Christ.  Now they are planning better things of their own.  Having resolved that there will be no God-created “new heaven and new earth”, these scoffers have decided to forge a man-created new world.

To this, Saint Paul admonishes, “Let no man deceive you by any means?  That day will not come before there first comes the great apostasy and that man who is sin personified is revealed, the inheritor of perdition who will oppose himself to and exalt himself above all that is called divine or that is worshipped by man, even sitting in the temple of God, claiming to be a god himself…Therefore, brethren, stand firm and hold fast to all the traditions which you have been taught, whether by word or by our epistle.”

The Orthodox Christian Church has always taught that the cause of the ultimate destruction of civilization will be the religious and moral decay of humanity; that the time would arrive when vast segments of the Holy Orthodoxy Church would apostatize, when a counter church, formed under Satan’s leadership, would arise and when evil will reign so strongly in the life of mankind that life on earth will become almost impossible.  Then the world will lose its right and its reason for existence.  The destruction will come about according to God’s sentence, but the cause of the sentence will be the evil of mankind.

Concerning the fulfillment of such prophecies, our attention must turn to Revelation 8:7-12 and the ninth chapter, where the visionary, Saint John, persistently emphasizes that various disasters and miseries will descent upon one-third of mankind and upon one-third of the earth’s surface at the beginning of the culmination of time.  “If one considers,” says Father Alexander Kolesnikov, “those nations and peoples which have become a sacrifice to wars and revolutions in the twentieth century, then it will be seen that they make up approximately one-third of the earth’s surface and population.”

Most especially, the “permanent” disasters, which include true martyrdoms and open warfare against he Church, have befallen Orthodox Christian nations – almost entirely in the first half of the twentieth century and general as one of the results of the first general war.  Communism captured all of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus before 1950.  Nor was Greece spared fro the Venezelists and several defiled Church leaders launched their attacks upon Holy Orthodoxy in Greece in the 1920’s, almost as if to counter the holy teaching and saintly example of Saint Nectarios of Pentapolis.  Alexandria, Antioch and the Church of China have also fallen under Communist controlled governments since the second general war.  [Since the publication of this book we have seen other huge Orthodox populations in the Middle East be almost wiped out by the Muslim invasions.]  One cannot help but have the impression that the evil forces of the world have set themselves to the task of weakening the Orthodox Christian peoples in order to remove the main obstacles to the realization of their future plans.  [St. Paul spoke of the force that would hinder the arrival of the antichrist until that force would be taken away reminding us also of God’s willingness to spare Sodom and Gomorrah if ten righteous men could have been found.]

In addition to the shock of world events and of man’s inhumanity to his fellow man, authors of anti-Christ philosophical, political and religious theories and systems have attacked Christianity especially heavily in recent times.  For the most part, these philosophies have taught, and still are teaching, that a “law of progress” reigns in the history of mankind.  Accordingly, humanity, in all aspects of its existence, has, throughout its history, evolved upward.  These philosophers teach that the political, social and ideological forms of the life of the human race are continually improving and that man will eventually find and bring about, by his own power and human development, the most complete and ideal political and social order of life; an order in which reason, science, peace, safety, justice and material well-being will be complete.  As a matter of fact, a large number of defiled, nominal Orthodox Christian leaders have begun to present such thesis.  Most notable amongst these are hierarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarchate which has begun to teach these things “so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect”. 

Christ, on the other hand, taught something completely the opposite.  Christ foretold that there would be “wars and rumors of wars”; that there would be “not peace, but the sword”; that the “love of many will grow cold because of the violence of mankind”.  Let us look at the history of the twentieth century and ask: who has been proven to be right, Christ or the wistful philosophers?  There has arrived no reign of reason, but rather a reign of the most coarse materialism and animalistic passions in man.  In place of peace and safety there are terrible wars and the almost daily rumor of new wars; instead of justice we have witnessed violence, rioting, murders, mass executions, concentration camps; instead of material well-being, there are regular reports of mass starvations and deprivations of millions.  Instead of accord with the reason of religion there is the almost daily appearance and strengthening of sects with the darkest of teachings – freemasonry, Theosophy, Baha’i, Kabala, Islam, so-called Christian Science, open Satan worship and witchcraft cults to name only a few.

What is more significant is the fact that the will to resist all these evil movements has begun to leave mankind.  Now, people can accept Satan cults with little or no shock, pausing only briefly to be dismayed or horrified [before returning to their favorite movie happy hour].  That society in general is willing to condone Satanic acts is clearly demonstrated in the legalization of abortions.  The mass extermination of babies for immorality and convenience has not only ceased to shock most people, but has become accepted as a “norm”.

END OF PART I – TO BE CONTINUED

Tuesday, August 27, 2013


The Crucial Distinction Between the Rationalism of Western Christianity and the Mysticism of the Eastern Orthodox Church

The split between the East and the West in 1054 AD, known as the Great Schism, was not merely the result of a few different theological points.  To be sure, there were serious differences of theology such as the addition of words to the Creed that altered or distorted a proper understanding of the relationship of the Godhead to the Trinity – a distortion that works its way out in how salvation is perceived and lived.  Then there was the divide over the primacy of the pope as well as other theological differences. 

But underlying the theological differences was a major divide between Western rationalism and Eastern mysticism.   This divide led to different ways of understanding God and salvation that has profound significance even today. 

Civilization in the West developed differently than in the East.  Rome fell prey to several major influences and movements that did not have any significant impact on the East. 

In the West society’s ways of thinking and understanding were shaped and formed by the Age of Enlightenment and Reason, Scholasticism and the development of Rationalism and Science as the foundation for all thinking, even theological.  These movements began in the world but quickly infiltrated the Papacy and what we know today as the Roman Catholic or Latin Church.  It’s a long history but some of the most noted theological voices of rationalism in the West were Aquinas, Anselm and Augustine. (Augustine in his later years.  In his earlier writings he was Orthodox but ended up being unduly influenced by Western rationalism.)  The Protestant Reformation was a product of these influences and continued to build upon the foundation of rationalism failing to understand that the issues they protested against were the products of the same rationalism that fueled and guided the Reformation.

Rationalism in Western Christianity looks to human intellect, reason and rational enlightenment as the best ways to approach and understand God.  There is an attempt to make the Christian Faith conform to human ideas of what is rational, scientific and enlightened.  Christianity should be explainable and discerned by knowledge and reason.  Thus, knowing God is more of an intellectual thing achieved by acquiring knowledge of God through study, books, lectures and information.  From this perspective the theology is derived from the theologians in the theological schools.  The theologian is someone with book knowledge, an intellectual scholar who can know and reveal God by study and research. 

In the East, the Church approached God much more from a mystical or spiritual point of view.   For those who have remained true to the Orthodox Tradition this is still true today.

This approach is derived from the understanding that sin and the resulting passions that afflict us also darken our minds and keep us from the true knowledge of God.  It is believed that a person who is still subject to the passions – pride, greed, vanity, lust, sloth, self-righteousness, selfishness, envy, jealousy, etc. – cannot attain to the discernment of the knowledge of God within himself.  Only those who by grace and by prayer, fasting, self-denial and obedience have been purified of their sinful passions, illumined by the Holy Spirit and attained to a full and complete communion with God (theosis) can truly know and reveal the knowledge of God.  Their hearts and minds are enlightened/illumined with the knowledge of God by direct experience of God in a way that is not known by the carnal person who is still subject to sinful passions.   God is known by experience in a purified heart more than in a head full of knowledge. "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God".

The knowledge of God comes not from the intellect, books and lectures but from the saints who have experienced communion with the uncreated Light of God.  They have entered into the Glory of God as did Moses on Mt. Sinai, Elias on Mt Horab and the disciples on Mt. Tabor.  In that Glory, the knowledge of God is revealed to the heart of man, not as intellectual knowledge but as the experience of God in the Holy Spirit.  These are the true theologians of the Church.  It is on this basis that the Orthodox Church claims to possess the fullness of the Faith and to be the True Church of Christ.  It is not because we have theologians who are smarter than your theologians but because the truth we hold is born witness to by those who in purity have been in the presence of God and have beheld the vision of the uncreated Light/Glory of God.  God is revealed to the Church mystically/spiritually, not rationally according to the wisdom of this world.  The wisdom of this world knows not the things of God.  We look to the saints, fathers, confessors and martyrs for the revelation of the knowledge of God – those who in purity have beheld the face of God in the Holy Spirit.  We do not derive our interpretations and understanding of the Christian faith from rational book knowledge still subject to the sinful passions.  We believe and honor the saints of this age for the same reason we believe and honor the saints of old - Abraham, Moses, Elijah, all the prophets and the apostles - because they learned the knowledge of God through the experience of beholding the vision of God in a way the rest of us do not due to our sinful and darkened mind and passions.

Conflict between these two approaches to God came to a head in the fourteenth century in the debate between a Roman theologian named Barlaam and St. Gregory Palamas, a monk from Mt. Athos and Archbishop of Thessalonica. 

Barlaam, following the rationalism of the West, said that man can come to the knowledge of God through his reason and intellect and is a Christian by virtue of living an ethical life and fulfilling the obligations of the Christian life.

St. Gregory posited that knowing God and living for God is a matter of union and communion with God in the Holy Spirit that involves purification of the passions, illumination of the heart by the Holy Spirit, and participation in the uncreated Light of God Himself.     

The ultimate result is two different approaches to salvation.  For the Western rational mindset, salvation became much more centered in the knowledge of certain facts, following certain steps or principals, adhering to certain ethics and fulfilling certain obligations.  The theology of salvation developed much more along legal, Roman law, and juridical models emphasizing the objective/external nature of salvation. Salvation is much more cerebral and perceived somewhat as a one time event obtained by a prayer.

The mystical approach of the East developed a therapeutic model of healing seeing salvation as a life long journey and the Church as a hospital.  This healing includes the purification of the heart from sinful passions, the illumination of the mind by the Holy Spirit, and beholding the Glory of God through theosis.  The illumination of the mind grows out of the purification of the passions and theosis grows out of both.  The theology of salvation centers on the mystical union with God in the Holy Spirit and a transformation or deification of human nature.  The path to salvation is a path of denying self, crucifying the sinful passions, devotion to prayer, obedience and fasting.  All of this presupposes life in the Church/Body of Christ where we absorb the life and spirit of the saints, submit our lives to a spiritual father for confession and guidance, and partake of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Holy Eucharist. Our salvation is a matter of inner spiritual union with Christ and His Body the Church through the Holy Spirit.

From time to time, Protestantism and even elements of Rome, have gone through periods of awakenings growing weary of the rational and intellectual approach to salvation – the institutional church as it is called.  This has resulted in the “Great Awakenings”, revival movements and charismatic movements of the 18th and 19th centuries.  But even these movements, having no awareness or connection to the mystical faith of the Eastern Orthodox Church, have always succumbed to extreme and wild emotional fanaticism, embracing numerous heresies, and leaving in their path a wake of disillusioned and burned out people either seeking the next movement and guru or becoming agnostic if not atheistic. 










Sunday, August 25, 2013


ICON IN THE SKY!
The heavens declare the glory of God….

On the first day of creation, when darkness covered the earth, God – the Uncreated Light, by the power of His WORD spoke created light into existence.  It was only on the fourth day of creation that God, by the power of His WORD, gathered the created light into one body called the sun.  The sun is an Icon of God.  From the sun we can learn a book full of truth. 

The sun was foreordained to rule all the lesser bodies and the created light of this sun that came from the Uncreated Light – God, would be the source for natural life on earth.  Without it, there could be no life.  All the planets and all of life would revolve around the sun.  It is the center of the universe.

The sun reveals the Holy Trinity.  The sun itself is fire that is not dependent on any other source but yet is never consumed – never burns out.  The Sun is unapproachable by man.  Anyone who gets too close will be consumed.  God the Father, in His essence is unknowable, unapproachable and incomprehensible.

The light that comes from the sun is an Icon of Christ, the Light of the world.  By the light of the sun, we know the sun and participate in its life.  By Christ the Light, God is revealed and we are illumined with the Theophany (manifestation/revelation) of God.

The energy or warmth of the sun is an Icon of the Holy Spirit and the Grace of God.  The Grace of God through the Holy Spirit makes alive that which is dead and empowers that which has no power of its own.

All the other bodies, the moon, planets and stars have light only in as much as they face and reflect the light of the sun.  When they are turned away from the sun they know only darkness as we do each night.

The light that comes from the sun when reflected through a prism reveals seven different colors, Icons of the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit.   Different objects depending on their nature reflect this light differently.   Objects that are dark don’t reflect much light; objects that are light do.   In this we can see the nature of sin and purity and how it affects the Light and Energy of God in us and through us.   

On rare occasions there is a total eclipse of the sun.  This event holds the world in awe with a certain sense of mystery, fear and dread.  Here we see a glimpse of eternity away from the presence of God – eternal darkness void of life and light and joy where the worm of fear, misery and torment never dies.


Sunday, August 11, 2013


Testing The Spirits In Contemporary Christianity
Discerning between the spirit of man and the Spirit of God

In the Bible we are told, “Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God; because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (I John 4:1).

It is a message about the importance of discernment.  The very idea of discernment is based on the assumption that some things are true and some things are false; that there is a Spirit of truth and a spirit of deception. 

The need for discernment also tells us that it is not always easy to tell the difference between the true and the false, the right and the wrong, because evil or false spirits are deceptive and not easily discerned.  They are able to appear as good and even as angels of light “For Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light” (2 Cor. 11:14).  This means that false spirits can appear to be representing God even as preachers and miracle workers and are capable of deceiving many.   One of the outstanding characteristics of the spirit of anti-Christ is the spirit of deception “Even him whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deception of unrighteousness” and many will succumb “…because they received not the love of the truth that they might be save” (2 Thess. 2:9-10). The Saviour said that at the last judgment “Many will say to me in that day Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name and in thy name have cast out devils and in thy name done many wonderful works?  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you…”  (Matt 7: 22).  These fearful words remind us that the spirit of deception is real, that it is hard to discern from the spirit of truth and that many who think they are following the spirit of truth are in fact being deceived and are following the spirit of deception.

In the Revelation given to St. John we hear the massage of Christ to the seven Churches of Asia in which they are warned that an outward appearance of Christianity and spiritual prosperity means little.  They will be cast out of the kingdom if they do not do the will of God by casting out the false teachings and teachers and embrace the truth  (Rev. 2-3).

 Contrary to popular belief, just because someone claims to believe in Jesus or even performs miracles, does not mean he/she is of God.  This should raise an immediate question.  If false spirits can appear as angels of light and if good and sincere people can be deceived by the spirit of deception while thinking they are not, how are we to discern what is false and what is not?  This is a crucial question.  

The idea of discernment has almost disappeared from our post-Christian world, both in society at large and in Contemporary Christianity.  (Contemporary Christianity in this article is used to include all church bodies, churches, branches, groups, non-denominational, inter-denominational and denominations that bear the name Christian but have departed from the historic Christian faith to embrace newly invented forms of Christianity.)

In our society today discernment is to a great extent left up to each individual as to what is good or bad.  The only prevailing standards are societal norms and even these are subject to change based on popular opinion, votes and fads.  Interestingly enough, discernment in Contemporary Christianity, for the most part, is also left up to each individual to determine what is of God and what isn’t.  The only prevailing standard is the Bible with interpretations and meanings determined by popular trends, books, gurus and the latest movement or “spiritual awakening”. Contemporary Christianity is usually only a few years behind the world in what is embraced and determined acceptable.  Both in society at large and in Contemporary Christianity all is subject to change.  Even in groups that claim to hold to certain standards, it is rare to see such standards actually enforced or required.  The whole mega and non-denominational church movement has been an attempt to avoid teachings and forms that offend or put people off.  In this setting of user friendly and consumer driven forms of “Christianity” there can be no interest in discernment of the spirits.  After all, who’s to say?  There is no fixed or established rule or measurement by which all teachings and spirits are to be judged since man is understood to be autonomous.  Contemporary Christianity forgets that man’s self assumed autonomy was the cause of the fall in Eden. 

So we see that in Contemporary Christianity there is little to no discernment between the spirit of error and the spirit of truth.  This has profound implications for a potential confusion between the spirit of man and the Spirit of God, as we shall see.

Because Contemporary Christianity has been infected with numerous heresies and lost all sense of what heresy is and what it does, it has lost its spiritual discernment. The distinction between the spirit of the world, the spirit of man and the Holy Spirit of God has been clouded and confused.

Very often that which Contemporary Christianity identifies as the Spirit of God, i.e. the Holy Spirit, would have been (and still is) perceived by the historical Christian faith as the spirit of man, the world or even the Devil.

It is important to understand the distinction between the spirit of man and the Spirit of God in order to see how these are being confused. 

First, there is the spirit of man – the human spirit that has been subjected to sin, death and corruption.  And then there is the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Trinity.   They are not the same but many today seem unable to make the distinction.  Is it possible that many may think they are being led by the Holy Spirit when they are really being lead by their human spirit?  This is a crucial discernment that begs the question “Is Contemporary Christianity merely an expression of the spirit of man or does it possess the Spirit of God?”

The human spirit is capable of seeking out that which is noble or seeking out that which is base or things in between, neither noble nor base.  The human spirit leads some to a life in the gutter characterized by evil.  In others, the human spirit rises to embrace that which is noble and good and virtuous.   The noble actions of the human spirit even lead man to seek godly things.  But the spirit of man rising to noble heights and even to spiritual hunger, while it may be a path to God, is not the same as the Holy Spirit given to the Church on the Day of Pentecost.  It is the spirit of man. The important point here is that the noble spirit of man, while good and right and even reflective of the light or image of God that remains in the fallen human nature is still not the same as the indwelling of the Holy Spirit as given to the Church at Pentecost.  The human spirit, as noble as it may be at times, is still subject to darkness, evil, deception and even misguided good intentions.   

Practical Examples of the Confusion and Lack of Discernment in Contemporary Christianity

Consider the myriad forms of and ideas about worship that have grown up in Contemporary Christianity.   Contemporary worship is designed to reach the un-churched, appealing to them with the ways and mediums of the fallen world.  Seeing worship as a tool for evangelism is of itself a huge departure from the historical faith of the Church and reflects the spirit of man rather than the Spirit of God.  The worship of the Church, all the way back to Israel in the Old Testament has been understood to be divinely revealed so as to reflect the purity of truth about God and intended only for the faithful.  Any changes or innovations were forbidden. It was seen as sacred and holy – a worship of God that reflects the holiness and truth of God to be offered to God only by those who hold these same truths.  

But contemporary forms of worship are not only for outreach; they are what the church members want as well.  People want to be entertained and pleased.  They want to feel good and uplifted and blessed.  They want a pleasant and pleasing and comfortable experience at church no less than at the symphony house, theatre or concert hall.  St Paul said in the last days people “will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned to fables” (2 Tim. 4:3-4).

Contemporary Christianity appeals to the spirit of man, noble as it may be, but does not answer to the Spirit of God.  Thus, in contemporary worship, you essentially have all the worldly forms of entertainment adapted to religious words, saying Lord, Lord.   Such is contemporary music, gospel music, praise bands, orchestras, chancel dramas, Christian rap, etc.

The point to be reckoned with here is that there is a seamless transition from the concert hall to the church.  Not only in the forms of worship but also in the design, decorations and appointments of the buildings.  They resemble the lobbies of the finest concert halls replete with coffee and snack bars and theater seating.  People are carried away with the music.  They clap, dance, sway, swoon, yell, whistle or whatever in keeping with the spirit of the venue.  They are moved emotionally by the music.  But it is the spirit of man – his emotions - that is moved, nothing more.  But human emotions and the Spirit of God are two different things. The spirit of man responds in similar ways to different types of music or movies.  People cry or laugh.  They feel uplifted and moved.  They get chills and feel warm and glorious and wonderful.  But it is still the human spirit that is producing all of this.

People also have moving and life changing experiences in religious meetings and services.  During the Great Awakening people who claimed to be possessed by the Holy Spirit would shake, fall out, bark like a dog or crow like a rooster.  Today, in certain churches similar things happen.  Recently there was the so-called holy laughter movement where it was claimed that people who were possessed by the Holy Spirit were overcome with hysterical laughter to the point of falling out in the floor and rolling with laughter.  On religious TV it is common to see people being “slain in the spirit”, jerking, convulsing or dancing a jig “in the spirit”.  All of this is attributed to the Holy Spirit, but is it?  Could it rather reflect a lack of discernment between heresy and truth and between the spirit of man and the Spirit of God?  How does one answer or know?  The person moved to jubilation and chills by a rousing secular concert feels much the same as the person moved by listening to contemporary Christian music?  The responses are very similar as well.  There may be laughter or crying or shouting or clapping with warm and good feelings.  Does anyone even consider whether what he/she is experiencing is the human spirit of emotions or the Holy Spirit?  How do you know or determine which it is?  Are there any determining criteria beyond what I feel or think in myself?  Some will say that they know because the Spirit bears witness with their spirit.  But how is this different from what someone feels in his spirit at a great performance of the Boston Pops?  How do you know it is not just your human spirit being inspired by something noble or good?

People experience the movement of the “spirit” when listening to gospel or contemporary Christian music, or Christian Rap concerts, or moving cantatas or when Elvis Presley or Dolly Parton sing Amazing Grace and How Great Thou Art, or listening to Bach’s Christmas Oratorio, or Enrico Caruso’s performance of La Donna e Mobile in Verdi’s Rigoletto Opera, or Luicano Pavoratti singing Ave Maria.  People are moved by the “spirit” when they visit a magnificent cathedral, even people who are not particularly religious.  All these experiences are powerful movements of the spirit.  But are they movements of the spirit of man or the Holy Spirit?  How do you tell?  How do you discern?  Is it all based on whether religious words are being sung?  But even the devil can appear as an angel of light quoting Scripture.  Is it all determined by whether or not you feel like it is the Holy Spirit?  What of those who feel this way but will be excluded from the kingdom of heaven according to the words of Christ quoted earlier?  Many naturally assume they are being touched by the Holy Spirit, but are they?  Could it simply be the powerful and emotional movement of the spirit of man?  How do we discern between the two?

Many of these extraordinary experiences and movements of the “spirit” can be found in various non-Christian religions and even in pagan demon possessions.   Even in religions that do not believe in the Christ of the Bible people are moved by the “spirit” and claim to have life changing conversions.  Could any or all of this in some way be related to the words of the Saviour that “…in that day many will say to me Lord, Lord have we not prophesied in Thy name and in Thy name cast out demons and in they name done many wonderful works?  Then will I say unto them, ‘depart from me for I never knew you’”?

Since the Bible warns of a spirit of deception and a lack of love for the truth that will lead people to seek out those who tell them what pleases them or is satisfying to their ears (human spirit), shouldn’t it behoove us to take seriously this question of discernment between the spirit of man and the Holy Spirit? 

And so the question is how can we know and discern the truth?  The obvious answer is by the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth.  But then the question is where is the Holy Spirit to be found in all the confusion, contradictive voices, conflicting experiences and myriad of feelings and emotions?  If it is not enough to say “Lord, Lord” or to profess to work and speak in His name where do we turn for answers about truth?

There is only one place to turn and that is to what St. Paul called “the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth” (I Timothy 3:15) and to what St. Jude called “the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 1:3).  

Christ established His Church for this very purpose and gave the Holy Spirit to the Church on the Day of Pentecost by which He said the Church would be led into all truth and preserved from deception.  

But now we are confronted with another question.  Where is this Church?  Is it the Baptists, the Methodists, the Charismatics or another of the hundreds if not thousands of groups claiming to be the Church?  How can such a myriad of voices, contradictions and uncertainty be the pillar and ground of the truth or THE FAITH ONCE DELIVERED?   Or is it some invisible fellowship in the sky that can’t be clearly defined or known?  How can you find truth in something invisible, uncertain, uncontained and undefined?

Just as there is one God the Father and one Lord Jesus Christ, there is also one Holy Spirit.  This one Spirit reveals one truth, one faith, one baptism and one Church (Eph 4:3-6).  Man cannot recreate the Holy Spirit in each generation and each culture.  He can only unite himself to the one undivided, unchanging, Holy Spirit that has always revealed Himself as the same in all generations.  Consequently, the same is true for truth, the Christian faith and the Church as well as Christ Himself.  They cannot be recreated.  They can only be believed and embraced as they have always been.

The Holy Spirit once given to the Church indwells those of each succeeding generation who embrace the one and same truth and life as it is passed on by Apostolic Succession.  In this way there is one unchanging truth from beginning to ending.  Apart from this Holy Spirit there is only the human spirit or human emotions that many identify with the Spirit of God.

This distinction becomes very apparent when you take a closer look at the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church that has remained in one truth from the Day of Pentecost and is known today as the Orthodox Church – which means right believing/right worshipping Church.  The spirit experienced in Contemporary Christian churches is foreign and alien to the Orthodox, and the spirit experienced in the Orthodox Church is foreign and alien to the spirit of Contemporary Christianity.  They are not the same.  Someone who desires the spirit experienced in Contemporary Christianity will be put off and turned off by the spirit of Orthodoxy.  Orthodoxy distinguishes these two spirits as the spirit of man and the Holy Spirit.   While the spirit of man can be equally moved by a Rock concert, a Gospel concert, a Pops concert or Dolly Parton singing Amazing Grace, the Holy Spirit known in the Orthodox Church is very different from these venues and is known and experienced differently. 

The worship of Contemporary Christianity is earthly and fleshly and strikes a note of accord with the human spirit or human emotions.  The worship of the Orthodox Church is of the Holy Spirit and does not appeal to fallen human emotions.  That which is of the flesh is flesh and that which is of the Spirit is Spirit.   This distinction can be observed in the following.  A non-Christian person living a worldly, carnal, immoral lifestyle who doesn’t pray or believe much of anything can walk into a contemporary service and find great enjoyment there much as he would at a rock concert.  He enjoys the service.  He is moved emotionally.  This same person would definitely not enjoy an Orthodox worship service.  The spirit of Orthodox worship would not appeal to his spirit at all.   They are two different spirits. 

The early Church did not permit the un-initiated to attend their worship services.   In fact, the un-initiated clearly did not want to attend those services.  We read in the Acts of the Apostles that the believers were gathering in one accord in Solomon’s porch (part of the Temple separated out from others) but the rest (unbelievers) did not join themselves to them (Acts 5:12-13).  The Church manifested a Spirit different from and unappealing to the spirit of man – the spirit of the world. 

The spirit of man, as noble as it may be, is not the same as the Holy Spirit given to the Church.  In our day Contemporary Christianity fails to make this distinction.